<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: STERNBERG MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY &#8211; HAYS, KANSAS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kansasbeautiful.com/western-kansas-tourism/sternberg-museum-of-natural-history-hays-kansas.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kansasbeautiful.com/western-kansas-tourism/sternberg-museum-of-natural-history-hays-kansas.html</link>
	<description>Kansas Vacation Guide to attractions and events in Kansas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 02:21:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: L. Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasbeautiful.com/western-kansas-tourism/sternberg-museum-of-natural-history-hays-kansas.html/comment-page-1/#comment-5268</link>
		<dc:creator>L. Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasbeautiful.com/western-kansas-tourism/sternberg-museum-of-natural-history-hays-kansas.html#comment-5268</guid>
		<description>A fossil found at Fossil Oregon sometime in 1960 is now in my pocession.
It is my opinion the specimen is not &quot;one&quot; but &quot;two&quot; infant Basilosaurs sea- serpents from the late Eocene period. One of the sea creatures is &quot;intact&quot; while only a chest cavity of the second remains set in stone beside the other.

As you well know, the Basilosaurs were world-wide once teeming ancient seas; Their length would have expanded 40-80 feet with a weight of 7 tons.

When research first began on these &quot;two&quot; fossils, I was almost certain the creatures were &quot;sea-horses&quot; as is similar in size and mass to what a modern day sea-horse might look like today. Further research turned more toward ancient whales in make up and appearance. I finally come to the conclusion the fossils are probably &quot;infant&quot; Basilosaurus sea-serpents.

An attempt to photograph the sea serpents is now under way. Hopeful with added light that a clear image of the two fossils might soon be developed for further research and study. May I also send you a photograph to keep on file for your records? Any feed back from professioanl paleontogists will also be appreciated.

In Research, Larry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fossil found at Fossil Oregon sometime in 1960 is now in my pocession.<br />
It is my opinion the specimen is not &#8220;one&#8221; but &#8220;two&#8221; infant Basilosaurs sea- serpents from the late Eocene period. One of the sea creatures is &#8220;intact&#8221; while only a chest cavity of the second remains set in stone beside the other.</p>
<p>As you well know, the Basilosaurs were world-wide once teeming ancient seas; Their length would have expanded 40-80 feet with a weight of 7 tons.</p>
<p>When research first began on these &#8220;two&#8221; fossils, I was almost certain the creatures were &#8220;sea-horses&#8221; as is similar in size and mass to what a modern day sea-horse might look like today. Further research turned more toward ancient whales in make up and appearance. I finally come to the conclusion the fossils are probably &#8220;infant&#8221; Basilosaurus sea-serpents.</p>
<p>An attempt to photograph the sea serpents is now under way. Hopeful with added light that a clear image of the two fossils might soon be developed for further research and study. May I also send you a photograph to keep on file for your records? Any feed back from professioanl paleontogists will also be appreciated.</p>
<p>In Research, Larry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
